February 2015: Proposal Best Practice - Square Brackets Around All Compliance References
February 23, 2015
More and more often I see RFPs requiring specific references to SOW paragraphs and CDRLs within the text in the proposal responses. To make it easier for the evaluator to see/notice them, I use square brackets e.g. [CDRL A001] to visibly distinguish the compliance references from curved parentheses such as used for acronyms e.g. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
This best practice aligns with the common practice of L and M references within square brackets appended to document headings….e.g. 1.0 Title Of This Section [L 3.1.1; M 4.1.2]. It also enables the evaluator to use “[“ and “]” as electronic search terms to quickly discover and identify all of the compliance references within the document.
This innovative process and Proposal Navigator® tool efficiencies add productive work days to your constrained proposal development timelines.
Contact us for your capture/proposal support needs or to arrange your Proposal Navigator® system capability demonstration. 2015 pricing is $25,000 annual subscription (unlimited use) per proposal center site.
The Proposal Team's Mission
Synthesize and package the capture team’s vision into a compliant, convincing and compelling offering whose selection can be successfully defended ... without breaking the pursuit budget “bank”...
July 2017 Bid Protest Review™: The Challenger Can Have the Best Evaluated Transition-In Plan
July 3, 2017
This article reviews the recently published protest decision Matter of: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., B-414283; B-414283.2. Award was to be made on a best...
April 2014: Applying Persuasive Legal Writing Principles To Proposals
April 7, 2014
Engineers, like lawyers, are educated and trained problem solvers. Engineers are trained in technical writing for exams, theses and the like, with the...
September 2017 Bid Protest Review™: Inconsistencies Between BOEs and Technical Approach Can Lead To Moderate Proposal Risk
September 24, 2017
This article reviews the recently published protest decision Matter of: Lockheed Martin Corporation, B-411365.2.