Lately I’ve been hearing over and over again from capture managers and BD executives on how they’ve been admonished for overspending B&P on pursuits. Because BOE development often costs 25% or more of the entire proposal budget, it is ripe for process improvement in the area of cost savings.
I recently completed an engagement where BOE development process improvements resulted in a savings of 40% of the BOE budget, while simultaneously completing the high-quality BOEs on schedule.
How was it accomplished ?
Top down strategy developed and implemented from day 1
A Ford Motor Company assembly line approach, not Rolls Royce hand-build one at a time
Use of a small number of analogous prior programs
Heavy use of pre-developed templates and models, significant copy/ paste to similar BOEs
Small core team of good BOE writers, no cast of thousands, SME support on call
Core team fixed math and language problems, not just send-back for rework, which significantly reduced waste and churn
July 2017 Bid Protest Review™: The Challenger Can Have the Best Evaluated Transition-In Plan
July 3, 2017
This article reviews the recently published protest decision Matter of: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., B-414283; B-414283.2. Award was to be made on a best...
April 2014: Applying Persuasive Legal Writing Principles To Proposals
April 7, 2014
Engineers, like lawyers, are educated and trained problem solvers. Engineers are trained in technical writing for exams, theses and the like, with the...
September 2017 Bid Protest Review™: Inconsistencies Between BOEs and Technical Approach Can Lead To Moderate Proposal Risk
September 24, 2017
This article reviews the recently published protest decision Matter of: Lockheed Martin Corporation, B-411365.2.